Comments for Public Health in Focus http://www.publichealthinfocus.org © Samantha Kozikott Thu, 29 May 2014 23:54:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1 Comment on THE NEVERENDING GLOBAL BPA CONTROVERSY by Samantha Kozikott http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/2014/05/22/bpacontroversy/#comment-17 Thu, 29 May 2014 23:54:19 +0000 http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/?p=66#comment-17 Hi Laurie! Thank you for your comment. You make excellent points.

Most plastic products are marked with a number that corresponds to the type of plastic it is made of. The number, known a as ‘recycling code,’ can be found within the triangular recycling symbol (see above) that recyclable plastics are marked with.

The plastics you want to avoid are numbers 3, 6, and 7 – these are the types that can release nasty hormone disruptors and carcinogens into your food and drink.

#3 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) has di-2-ehtylhexyl phthalate (DEHP). DEHP is an endocrine disruptor and a likely human carcinogen.

#6 Polystyrene (PS) likely will leach styrene – which is another possible endocrine disruptor and probable human carcinogen- into your drink or food.

#7 Polycarbonate contains bisphenol-A, a the hormone disruptor. This chemical can leach out when it is heated or exposed to acidic solutions. This type of plastic is very common in sports bottles and is used in most baby bottles and 5-gallon water jugs – watch for this one!

Below are some tips for some basic practices that you can adopt for safer ‘plastic use.’

- Use Baby Bottles made of tempered glass or polypropylene (#5) or polyethylene (#1) (these do not contain bisphenol-A).

- Keep plastic products away from heat – heat tends to promote the leaching of chemicals. Even the safer types of plastics may leach chemicals due to heat or prolonged storage.

- Reusable containers or cups with stainless steel or ceramic interiors are a good substitute to your plastic ones.

- Do not reuse plastic drink bottles that were intended for single use.

- Bottled drinks should be used quickly as chemicals from the plastic leach over time…don’t buy plastic bottles of drinks if it has been on store shelves for a long time.

-Taste – if your drink has even a bit of a plastic taste to it, don’t drink it!

And finally, I found this quick video that gives a general run-down of all the info above:
Check it out:

]]>
Comment on THE NEVERENDING GLOBAL BPA CONTROVERSY by Laurie Concolino http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/2014/05/22/bpacontroversy/#comment-16 Fri, 23 May 2014 19:39:01 +0000 http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/?p=66#comment-16 It is very concerning that the public is being exposed to these harmful chemicals and there is not much public awareness on this issue. As Professor Kozikott taught me you can actually look on the bottom of your plastic bottles or containers that we eat and drink from and see the level of BPA in the plastic products this is something I was never aware of as I know a lot of other consumers are not aware of it is also frustrating that in order to purchase the safer options such as organic produce it’s a great deal more expensive so some families that cannot afford it must be exposed to more chemicals due to costs this seems unfair

]]>
Comment on Contact by Pete http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/contact/#comment-15 Fri, 23 May 2014 19:30:41 +0000 http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/?page_id=37#comment-15 Samantha,
I am impressed by your range of expertise! I enjoyed the articles, especially the ones on BPA and shunting. I will email you a few personal commments. Thank you for sharing these with me.

]]>
Comment on First 1,000 Days: Battle Against Undernutrition and Stunting by Tara Ornstein http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/2014/05/20/first-1000-days-battle-against-undernutrition-and-stunting/#comment-14 Thu, 22 May 2014 17:56:32 +0000 http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/?p=1#comment-14 Very important article and excellent suggestions for resolving a serious threat to child health.

]]>
Comment on First 1,000 Days: Battle Against Undernutrition and Stunting by Samantha http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/2014/05/20/first-1000-days-battle-against-undernutrition-and-stunting/#comment-13 Thu, 22 May 2014 16:39:23 +0000 http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/?p=1#comment-13 Thank you Evonne! Stay tuned =D

]]>
Comment on THE NEVERENDING GLOBAL BPA CONTROVERSY by Samantha http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/2014/05/22/bpacontroversy/#comment-12 Thu, 22 May 2014 16:32:54 +0000 http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/?p=66#comment-12 Thank you Debika for your comment.

Yes!, making the ” safer” not the “safest” choice seems to be the only alternative today whether it’s making a choice in the type of plastic or grocery food.

Every consumer has the option to buy or not buy a product. That leverage can change whole industry.

As I biologist and public health professional, I have followed with great interest the bis-phenol A debate. And I have studied the alternatives for can coatings and plastic wraps. There are some very viable and affordable alternatives for replacing the bis A plastic wraps.However, the toxicity of the approved, much more expensive, alternatives for can coatings remains questionable as well.

I’m glad that the FDA hasn’t yet completely ignored the science showing harm, and I actually agree that more research is a good thing. However, it makes me uncomfortable to think that while the research and regulatory process drags on (for how many more years now?) consumers are continuing to be exposed. Let’s hope the FDA remembers their responsibility to public health and takes action soon. Meanwhile, consumers need to continue to protect themselves.

]]>
Comment on First 1,000 Days: Battle Against Undernutrition and Stunting by Evonne http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/2014/05/20/first-1000-days-battle-against-undernutrition-and-stunting/#comment-11 Thu, 22 May 2014 15:58:54 +0000 http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/?p=1#comment-11 Good article. Very informative. Hope you write more such articles..

]]>
Comment on THE NEVERENDING GLOBAL BPA CONTROVERSY by Debika Marwah http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/2014/05/22/bpacontroversy/#comment-10 Thu, 22 May 2014 07:23:35 +0000 http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/?p=66#comment-10 sadly we are living in a world where almost everything including our fruits and vegetables are exposed to some type of chemical or the other and our bodies are getting used to them. we as consumers can only look for safer alternatives, and i mean SAFER NOT THE SAFEST because no product is 100% free from chemicals. However, if scientists have discovered adverse effects of a chemical on humans, the production and usage of it should be banned. the fact that researches are being conducted about it means that the degree of danger of consuming that chemical is high, meaning this chemical is more dangerous compared to other chemicals. So in my opinion its usage should be banned.

]]>
Comment on First 1,000 Days: Battle Against Undernutrition and Stunting by Samantha http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/2014/05/20/first-1000-days-battle-against-undernutrition-and-stunting/#comment-9 Thu, 22 May 2014 03:39:19 +0000 http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/?p=1#comment-9 Thank you Fay! I will be writing some more soon. Stay tuned!=D

]]>
Comment on First 1,000 Days: Battle Against Undernutrition and Stunting by Samantha http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/2014/05/20/first-1000-days-battle-against-undernutrition-and-stunting/#comment-8 Thu, 22 May 2014 03:38:31 +0000 http://www.publichealthinfocus.org/?p=1#comment-8 Thank you =)

]]>